Clinical Trials

Find trials

Perform a New Search

Search Results 111-120 of 813 for

Edit search filters

Mayo Clinic Location	Status	Contact
Jacksonville, Fla.	Closed for enrollment	View complete study & contact information
Scottsdale/Phoenix, Ariz.	Closed for enrollment

Mayo Clinic Location	Status	Contact
Jacksonville, Fla.	Closed for enrollment	View complete study & contact information

Mayo Clinic Location	Status	Contact
Jacksonville, Fla.	Closed for enrollment	View complete study & contact information

Mayo Clinic Location	Status	Contact
Scottsdale/Phoenix, Ariz.	Closed for enrollment	View complete study & contact information

A Study to Evaluate Daratumumab/rHuPh20 +/- Lenalidomide as Post-ASCT Maintenance for Multiple Myeloma with Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) to Direct Therapy Duration

Eau Claire, WI, Rochester, MN, Scottsdale/Phoenix, AZ

See Details

A Study to Evaluate Daratumumab/rHuPh20 +/- Lenalidomide as Post-ASCT Maintenance for Multiple Myeloma with Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) to Direct Therapy Duration

Study type:
Interventional
Describes the nature of a clinical study. Types include:
- Observational study — observes people and measures outcomes without affecting results.
- Interventional study (clinical trial) — studies new tests, treatments, drugs, surgical procedures or devices.
- Medical records research — uses historical information collected from medical records of large groups of people to study how diseases progress and which treatments and surgeries work best.
Study phase:
3
During the early phases (phases 1 and 2), researchers assess safety, side effects, optimal dosages and risks/benefits. In the later phase (phase 3), researchers study whether the treatment works better than the current standard therapy. They also compare the safety of the new treatment with that of current treatments. Phase 3 trials include large numbers of people to make sure that the result is valid. There are also less common very early (phase 0) and later (phase 4) phases. Phase 0 trials are small trials that help researchers decide if a new agent should be tested in a phase 1 trial. Phase 4 trials look at long-term safety and effectiveness, after a new treatment has been approved and is on the market.

About this study

The primary purpose of this study is to compare overall survival between two treatment arms, with lenalidomide as the comparator arm and lenalidomide + daratumumab/rHuPH20 as the experimental arm, in post-autologous transplant multiple myeloma (MM) patients.

Participating Mayo Clinic locations

Study statuses change often. Please contact us for help.

Mayo Clinic Location	Status	Contact
Rochester, Minn.	Closed for enrollment	View complete study & contact information
Eau Claire, Wis.	Closed for enrollment
Scottsdale/Phoenix, Ariz.	Closed for enrollment

Print study details

Site IRB:
- Rochester, Minnesota: 19-009968
- Eau Claire, Wisconsin: 19-009968
- Scottsdale/Phoenix, Arizona: 19-009968
NCT ID:
NCT04071457
Sponsor Protocol Number:
S1803

Liposomal Cytarabine-Daunorubicin CPX-351, Fludarabine Phosphate, Cytarabine, and Filgrastim in Treating Younger Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Rochester, MN
- See Details
Liposomal Cytarabine-Daunorubicin CPX-351, Fludarabine Phosphate, Cytarabine, and Filgrastim in Treating Younger Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia
- Study type:
  Interventional
  Describes the nature of a clinical study. Types include:
  
  Observational study — observes people and measures outcomes without affecting results.
  
  Interventional study (clinical trial) — studies new tests, treatments, drugs, surgical procedures or devices.
  
  Medical records research — uses historical information collected from medical records of large groups of people to study how diseases progress and which treatments and surgeries work best.
- Study phase:
  1
  During the early phases (phases 1 and 2), researchers assess safety, side effects, optimal dosages and risks/benefits. In the later phase (phase 3), researchers study whether the treatment works better than the current standard therapy. They also compare the safety of the new treatment with that of current treatments. Phase 3 trials include large numbers of people to make sure that the result is valid. There are also less common very early (phase 0) and later (phase 4) phases. Phase 0 trials are small trials that help researchers decide if a new agent should be tested in a phase 1 trial. Phase 4 trials look at long-term safety and effectiveness, after a new treatment has been approved and is on the market.
About this study

This phase I/II trial studies the side effects and best dose of liposomal cytarabine-daunorubicin CPX-351 (CPX-351) when given with fludarabine phosphate, cytarabine, and filgrastim and to see how well they work in treating younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia that has come back after treatment (relapsed) or is not responding to treatment (is refractory). Liposomal cytarabine-daunorubicin CPX-351 is made up of two chemotherapy drugs, cytarabine and daunorubicin hydrochloride, and works to stop cancer cell growth by blocking the cells from dividing. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as fludarabine phosphate and cytarabine, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Filgrastim may increase the production of blood cells and may help the immune system recover from the side effects of chemotherapy. Giving liposomal cytarabine-daunorubicin CPX-351 followed by fludarabine phosphate, cytarabine, and filgrastim may be a better treatment for patients with relapsed acute myeloid leukemia and may cause fewer side effects to the heart, a common effect of other chemotherapy treatments for acute myeloid leukemia.

Participating Mayo Clinic locations

Study statuses change often. Please contact us for help.

Mayo Clinic Location Status Contact

Rochester, Minn.

Closed for enrollment
View complete study & contact information

Print study details
Site IRB:
Rochester, Minnesota: 16-005913

NCT ID:
NCT02642965

Sponsor Protocol Number:
AAML1421

A Study to Evaluate Niraparib and TSR-042 in Patients with Germline or Somatic BRCA1/2 and PALB2-related Pancreatic Cancer

Rochester, MN, Jacksonville, FL, Scottsdale/Phoenix, AZ

See Details

A Study to Evaluate Niraparib and TSR-042 in Patients with Germline or Somatic BRCA1/2 and PALB2-related Pancreatic Cancer

Study type:
Interventional
Describes the nature of a clinical study. Types include:
- Observational study — observes people and measures outcomes without affecting results.
- Interventional study (clinical trial) — studies new tests, treatments, drugs, surgical procedures or devices.
- Medical records research — uses historical information collected from medical records of large groups of people to study how diseases progress and which treatments and surgeries work best.
Study phase:
2
During the early phases (phases 1 and 2), researchers assess safety, side effects, optimal dosages and risks/benefits. In the later phase (phase 3), researchers study whether the treatment works better than the current standard therapy. They also compare the safety of the new treatment with that of current treatments. Phase 3 trials include large numbers of people to make sure that the result is valid. There are also less common very early (phase 0) and later (phase 4) phases. Phase 0 trials are small trials that help researchers decide if a new agent should be tested in a phase 1 trial. Phase 4 trials look at long-term safety and effectiveness, after a new treatment has been approved and is on the market.

About this study

In our own data sequencing 3,000 patients with pancreatic cancer, approximately 3% of pancreatic cancer patients harbor germline mutations in DNA repair genes such as BRCA1/2 and PALB2, and are therefore potential candidates for PARP-inhibitor therapy. In addition, somatic mutations in Homologous Recombination Repair (HRR) genes can confer sensitivity as well, and have been reported to double the number of patients potentially eligible for such therapy. The Keynote-162 study of niraparib and pembrolizumab has validated this approach, with early reports of impressive efficacy. Although unselected trials in pancreatic cancer with immunotherapy alone have yet to be successful, we hypothesize that induced genetic variation with PARP inhibition disrupting the tumor microenvironment and increasing neoepitope expression can sensitize tumors to immune checkpoint inhibition. We have developed preliminary data with RNAseq suggesting that potent PARP inhibition is associated with gain of novel mutations in pancreas cell lines, even compared to cisplatin alone, or irinotecan alone. We propose that a combination of PARP inhibition and anti-PD1 therapy has valuable therapeutic potential in pancreatic cancer. HRR deficient pancreatic cancer has largely been defined to date based on mutations in well-established genes such as BRCA1/2 and PALB2. However, more DNA repair associated genes are becoming associated with risk for pancreatic cancer and may well impact tumor phenotype. The goal would be to evaluate the combination of niraparib and TSR-042 in patients with germline or somatic mutations in BRCA1/2 or PALB2.

Participating Mayo Clinic locations

Study statuses change often. Please contact us for help.

Mayo Clinic Location	Status	Contact
Rochester, Minn.	Closed for enrollment	View complete study & contact information
Jacksonville, Fla.	Closed for enrollment
Scottsdale/Phoenix, Ariz.	Closed for enrollment

Print study details

Site IRB:
- Rochester, Minnesota: 18-003525
- Jacksonville, Florida: 18-003525
- Scottsdale/Phoenix, Arizona: 18-003525
NCT ID:
NCT04493060
Sponsor Protocol Number:
MC1841

Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Treating Patients With Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma Undergoing Surgery

Rochester, MN
- See Details
Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Treating Patients With Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma Undergoing Surgery
- Study type:
  Interventional
  Describes the nature of a clinical study. Types include:
  
  Observational study — observes people and measures outcomes without affecting results.
  
  Interventional study (clinical trial) — studies new tests, treatments, drugs, surgical procedures or devices.
  
  Medical records research — uses historical information collected from medical records of large groups of people to study how diseases progress and which treatments and surgeries work best.
- Study phase:
  2/3
  During the early phases (phases 1 and 2), researchers assess safety, side effects, optimal dosages and risks/benefits. In the later phase (phase 3), researchers study whether the treatment works better than the current standard therapy. They also compare the safety of the new treatment with that of current treatments. Phase 3 trials include large numbers of people to make sure that the result is valid. There are also less common very early (phase 0) and later (phase 4) phases. Phase 0 trials are small trials that help researchers decide if a new agent should be tested in a phase 1 trial. Phase 4 trials look at long-term safety and effectiveness, after a new treatment has been approved and is on the market.
About this study

The purpose of this study is to anayze the usefulness of treatment with nivolumab and ipilimumab in addition to standard of care chemotherapy and radiation therapy in patients with esophageal and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma who are undergoing surgery. Immunotherapy with antibodies, such as nivolumab and ipilimumab, may remove the brake on the body's immune system and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Chemotherapy and radiation therapy may reduce the tumor size and the amount of normal tissue that needs to be removed during surgery. A combined treatment with nivolumab and ipilimumab, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy might be more effective in patients with esophageal and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma who are undergoing surgery.

Participating Mayo Clinic locations

Study statuses change often. Please contact us for help.

Mayo Clinic Location Status Contact

Rochester, Minn.

Closed for enrollment
View complete study & contact information

Print study details
Site IRB:
Rochester, Minnesota: 22-000135

NCT ID:
NCT03604991

Sponsor Protocol Number:
EA2174

A Study Comparing Ibrutinib and Obinutuzumab With or Without Venetoclax in Treating Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

La Crosse, WI, Eau Claire, WI, Mankato, MN, Scottsdale/Phoenix, AZ, Rochester, MN

See Details

A Study Comparing Ibrutinib and Obinutuzumab With or Without Venetoclax in Treating Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Study type:
Interventional
Describes the nature of a clinical study. Types include:
- Observational study — observes people and measures outcomes without affecting results.
- Interventional study (clinical trial) — studies new tests, treatments, drugs, surgical procedures or devices.
- Medical records research — uses historical information collected from medical records of large groups of people to study how diseases progress and which treatments and surgeries work best.
Study phase:
3
During the early phases (phases 1 and 2), researchers assess safety, side effects, optimal dosages and risks/benefits. In the later phase (phase 3), researchers study whether the treatment works better than the current standard therapy. They also compare the safety of the new treatment with that of current treatments. Phase 3 trials include large numbers of people to make sure that the result is valid. There are also less common very early (phase 0) and later (phase 4) phases. Phase 0 trials are small trials that help researchers decide if a new agent should be tested in a phase 1 trial. Phase 4 trials look at long-term safety and effectiveness, after a new treatment has been approved and is on the market.

About this study

The purpose of this trial is to evaluate how well ibrutinib and obinutuzumab with or without venetoclax work in treating patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Ibrutinib may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, such as obinutuzumab, may help the body's immune system attack the cancer, and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as venetoclax, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Giving ibrutinib, obinutuzumab and venetoclax may work better in treating patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Participating Mayo Clinic locations

Study statuses change often. Please contact us for help.

Mayo Clinic Location	Status	Contact
Rochester, Minn.	Closed for enrollment	View complete study & contact information
La Crosse, Wis.	Closed for enrollment
Mankato, Minn.	Closed for enrollment
Eau Claire, Wis.	Closed for enrollment
Scottsdale/Phoenix, Ariz.	Closed for enrollment

Print study details

Site IRB:
- Rochester, Minnesota: 19-000455
- La Crosse, Wisconsin: 19-000455
- Mankato, Minnesota: 19-000455
- Eau Claire, Wisconsin: 19-000455
- Scottsdale/Phoenix, Arizona: 19-000455
NCT ID:
NCT03701282
Sponsor Protocol Number:
EA9161

Pagination Clinical studies

Clinical Trials

Filter Results

Locations

Study status

Gender

Age

Healthy Volunteer

Study phase

Search Results 111-120 of 813 for

A Study Comparing Combinations of Chemotherapy for Treating Women who have Undergone Surgery for Node-Positive Breast Cancer

Fat Emulsion in Preventing Hypersensitivity Reactions in Patients With Cancer Receiving Carboplatin or Oxaliplatin

A Phase 2 Study of Atezolizumab (an Engineered Anti-PDL1 Antibody) as Monotherapy or in Combination With Avastin (Bevacizumab) Compared to Sunitinib in Patients With Untreated Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma [IMmotion150]

A Phase 1/2 Trial of Gemcitabine Plus Nab-paclitaxel With or Without FG-3019 as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced, Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer

A Study to Evaluate Durvalumab Alone or in Combination With Novel Agents in Subjects With NSCLC

A Study to Evaluate Daratumumab/rHuPh20 +/- Lenalidomide as Post-ASCT Maintenance for Multiple Myeloma with Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) to Direct Therapy Duration

Liposomal Cytarabine-Daunorubicin CPX-351, Fludarabine Phosphate, Cytarabine, and Filgrastim in Treating Younger Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia

A Study to Evaluate Niraparib and TSR-042 in Patients with Germline or Somatic BRCA1/2 and PALB2-related Pancreatic Cancer

Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Treating Patients With Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma Undergoing Surgery

A Study Comparing Ibrutinib and Obinutuzumab With or Without Venetoclax in Treating Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Mayo Clinic Footer

Legal Conditions and Terms

Advertising

Reprint Permissions