Clinical Trials

Find trials

Perform a New Search

Search Results 1821-1830 of 2490 for

Edit search filters

Evaluation of CRS-207 With Pembrolizumab in Previously Treated MPM

Rochester, MN
- See Details
Evaluation of CRS-207 With Pembrolizumab in Previously Treated MPM
- Study type:
  Interventional
  Describes the nature of a clinical study. Types include:
  
  Observational study — observes people and measures outcomes without affecting results.
  
  Interventional study (clinical trial) — studies new tests, treatments, drugs, surgical procedures or devices.
  
  Medical records research — uses historical information collected from medical records of large groups of people to study how diseases progress and which treatments and surgeries work best.
- Study phase:
  2
  During the early phases (phases 1 and 2), researchers assess safety, side effects, optimal dosages and risks/benefits. In the later phase (phase 3), researchers study whether the treatment works better than the current standard therapy. They also compare the safety of the new treatment with that of current treatments. Phase 3 trials include large numbers of people to make sure that the result is valid. There are also less common very early (phase 0) and later (phase 4) phases. Phase 0 trials are small trials that help researchers decide if a new agent should be tested in a phase 1 trial. Phase 4 trials look at long-term safety and effectiveness, after a new treatment has been approved and is on the market.
About this study

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether CRS-207 with pembrolizumab is safe and effective in adults with MPM who have failed prior anti-cancer therapy.

Participating Mayo Clinic locations

Study statuses change often. Please contact us for help.

Mayo Clinic Location Status Contact

Rochester, Minn.

Closed for enrollment
View complete study & contact information

Print study details
Site IRB:
Rochester, Minnesota: 17-005071

NCT ID:
NCT03175172

Sponsor Protocol Number:
ADU-CL-13
Smoking Cessation Prior to Surgery to Reduce Surgical Complications in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Lung Cancer Who Smoke Cigarettes

Mankato, MN
- See Details
Smoking Cessation Prior to Surgery to Reduce Surgical Complications in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Lung Cancer Who Smoke Cigarettes
- Study type:
  Interventional
  Describes the nature of a clinical study. Types include:
  
  Observational study — observes people and measures outcomes without affecting results.
  
  Interventional study (clinical trial) — studies new tests, treatments, drugs, surgical procedures or devices.
  
  Medical records research — uses historical information collected from medical records of large groups of people to study how diseases progress and which treatments and surgeries work best.
- Study phase:
  3
  During the early phases (phases 1 and 2), researchers assess safety, side effects, optimal dosages and risks/benefits. In the later phase (phase 3), researchers study whether the treatment works better than the current standard therapy. They also compare the safety of the new treatment with that of current treatments. Phase 3 trials include large numbers of people to make sure that the result is valid. There are also less common very early (phase 0) and later (phase 4) phases. Phase 0 trials are small trials that help researchers decide if a new agent should be tested in a phase 1 trial. Phase 4 trials look at long-term safety and effectiveness, after a new treatment has been approved and is on the market.
About this study

This randomized phase III trial studies how well smoking cessation intervention works in reducing surgical complications in patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer who smoke cigarettes. This study will use two smoking cessation interventions: Varenicline (a drug that reduces the craving and withdrawal symptoms that occur with abstinence from nicotine) with behavioral interventions (consisting of a brief clinician-delivered intervention and tobacco quitline [tobacco cessation service available through a toll-free telephone number] follow-up) with placebo (a pill with no active medication) along with the same behavioral interventions. It is not yet known whether smoking cessation intervention prior to surgery is effective in reducing surgical complications for these patients.

Participating Mayo Clinic locations

Study statuses change often. Please contact us for help.

Mayo Clinic Location Status Contact

Mankato, Minn.

Closed for enrollment
View complete study & contact information

Print study details
Site IRB:
Mankato, Minnesota: 17-000868

NCT ID:
NCT02856581

Sponsor Protocol Number:
A211401

Mayo Clinic Location	Status	Contact
Mankato, Minn.	Closed for enrollment	View complete study & contact information

A Study to Evaluate Tazemetostat and Pembrolizumab to Treat Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma

Scottsdale/Phoenix, AZ, Rochester, MN, Jacksonville, FL

See Details

A Study to Evaluate Tazemetostat and Pembrolizumab to Treat Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma

Study type:
Interventional
Describes the nature of a clinical study. Types include:
- Observational study — observes people and measures outcomes without affecting results.
- Interventional study (clinical trial) — studies new tests, treatments, drugs, surgical procedures or devices.
- Medical records research — uses historical information collected from medical records of large groups of people to study how diseases progress and which treatments and surgeries work best.
Study phase:
1/2
During the early phases (phases 1 and 2), researchers assess safety, side effects, optimal dosages and risks/benefits. In the later phase (phase 3), researchers study whether the treatment works better than the current standard therapy. They also compare the safety of the new treatment with that of current treatments. Phase 3 trials include large numbers of people to make sure that the result is valid. There are also less common very early (phase 0) and later (phase 4) phases. Phase 0 trials are small trials that help researchers decide if a new agent should be tested in a phase 1 trial. Phase 4 trials look at long-term safety and effectiveness, after a new treatment has been approved and is on the market.

About this study

The primary purpose of this study is to conduct a safety lead-in phase that identifies the safe recommended phase II dose for combination tazemetostat and MK-3475 (pembrolizumab) in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma.

Participating Mayo Clinic locations

Study statuses change often. Please contact us for help.

Mayo Clinic Location	Status	Contact
Rochester, Minn.	Closed for enrollment	View complete study & contact information
Scottsdale/Phoenix, Ariz.	Closed for enrollment
Jacksonville, Fla.	Closed for enrollment

Print study details

Site IRB:
- Rochester, Minnesota: 19-011951
- Scottsdale/Phoenix, Arizona: 19-011951
- Jacksonville, Florida: 19-011951
NCT ID:
NCT03854474
Sponsor Protocol Number:
10183

A Study to Evaluate Gemcitabine Hydrochloride and Cisplatin With or Without Nab-Paclitaxel in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Advanced Biliary Tract Cancers

Eau Claire, WI, Scottsdale/Phoenix, AZ, Jacksonville, FL, Rochester, MN, La Crosse, WI

See Details

A Study to Evaluate Gemcitabine Hydrochloride and Cisplatin With or Without Nab-Paclitaxel in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Advanced Biliary Tract Cancers

Study type:
Interventional
Describes the nature of a clinical study. Types include:
- Observational study — observes people and measures outcomes without affecting results.
- Interventional study (clinical trial) — studies new tests, treatments, drugs, surgical procedures or devices.
- Medical records research — uses historical information collected from medical records of large groups of people to study how diseases progress and which treatments and surgeries work best.
Study phase:
3
During the early phases (phases 1 and 2), researchers assess safety, side effects, optimal dosages and risks/benefits. In the later phase (phase 3), researchers study whether the treatment works better than the current standard therapy. They also compare the safety of the new treatment with that of current treatments. Phase 3 trials include large numbers of people to make sure that the result is valid. There are also less common very early (phase 0) and later (phase 4) phases. Phase 0 trials are small trials that help researchers decide if a new agent should be tested in a phase 1 trial. Phase 4 trials look at long-term safety and effectiveness, after a new treatment has been approved and is on the market.

About this study

The purpose of this study is to evaluate how well gemcitabine hydrochloride and cisplatin given with or without nab-paclitaxel work in treating patients with newly diagnosed biliary tract cancers that have spread to other places in the body. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as gemcitabine hydrochloride, cisplatin, and nab-paclitaxel, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. It is not known if giving gemcitabine hydrochloride and cisplatin with or without nab-paclitaxel may work better at treating biliary tract cancers.

Participating Mayo Clinic locations

Study statuses change often. Please contact us for help.

Mayo Clinic Location	Status	Contact
Rochester, Minn.	Closed for enrollment	View complete study & contact information
La Crosse, Wis.	Closed for enrollment
Eau Claire, Wis.	Closed for enrollment
Jacksonville, Fla.	Closed for enrollment
Scottsdale/Phoenix, Ariz.	Closed for enrollment

Print study details

Site IRB:
- Rochester, Minnesota: 19-000930
- La Crosse, Wisconsin: 19-000930
- Eau Claire, Wisconsin: 19-000930
- Jacksonville, Florida: 19-000930
- Scottsdale/Phoenix, Arizona: 19-000930
NCT ID:
NCT03768414
Sponsor Protocol Number:
S1815

A Study of Preventive Treatment of Oxaliplatin Induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (POLAR-M)

La Crosse, WI
- See Details
A Study of Preventive Treatment of Oxaliplatin Induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (POLAR-M)
- Study type:
  Interventional
  Describes the nature of a clinical study. Types include:
  
  Observational study — observes people and measures outcomes without affecting results.
  
  Interventional study (clinical trial) — studies new tests, treatments, drugs, surgical procedures or devices.
  
  Medical records research — uses historical information collected from medical records of large groups of people to study how diseases progress and which treatments and surgeries work best.
- Study phase:
  3
  During the early phases (phases 1 and 2), researchers assess safety, side effects, optimal dosages and risks/benefits. In the later phase (phase 3), researchers study whether the treatment works better than the current standard therapy. They also compare the safety of the new treatment with that of current treatments. Phase 3 trials include large numbers of people to make sure that the result is valid. There are also less common very early (phase 0) and later (phase 4) phases. Phase 0 trials are small trials that help researchers decide if a new agent should be tested in a phase 1 trial. Phase 4 trials look at long-term safety and effectiveness, after a new treatment has been approved and is on the market.
About this study

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the investigational drug PledOx in the prevention of chronic chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) induced by the drug oxaliplatin.

Participating Mayo Clinic locations

Study statuses change often. Please contact us for help.

Mayo Clinic Location Status Contact

La Crosse, Wis.

Closed for enrollment
View complete study & contact information

Print study details
Site IRB:
La Crosse, Wisconsin: 18-001318

NCT ID:
NCT03654729

Sponsor Protocol Number:
PP06490

Mayo Clinic Location	Status	Contact
La Crosse, Wis.	Closed for enrollment	View complete study & contact information

A Study of a Personalized Neoantigen Cancer Vaccine

Scottsdale/Phoenix, AZ, Jacksonville, FL, Rochester, MN

See Details

A Study of a Personalized Neoantigen Cancer Vaccine

Study type:
Interventional
Describes the nature of a clinical study. Types include:
- Observational study — observes people and measures outcomes without affecting results.
- Interventional study (clinical trial) — studies new tests, treatments, drugs, surgical procedures or devices.
- Medical records research — uses historical information collected from medical records of large groups of people to study how diseases progress and which treatments and surgeries work best.
Study phase:
1/2
During the early phases (phases 1 and 2), researchers assess safety, side effects, optimal dosages and risks/benefits. In the later phase (phase 3), researchers study whether the treatment works better than the current standard therapy. They also compare the safety of the new treatment with that of current treatments. Phase 3 trials include large numbers of people to make sure that the result is valid. There are also less common very early (phase 0) and later (phase 4) phases. Phase 0 trials are small trials that help researchers decide if a new agent should be tested in a phase 1 trial. Phase 4 trials look at long-term safety and effectiveness, after a new treatment has been approved and is on the market.

About this study

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, dose, immunogenicity and early clinical activity of GRT-C901 and GRT-R902, a personalized neoantigen cancer vaccine, in combination with nivolumab and ipilimumab, in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, microsatellite stable colorectal cancer, gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma, and metastatic urothelial cancer.

Participating Mayo Clinic locations

Study statuses change often. Please contact us for help.

Mayo Clinic Location	Status	Contact
Rochester, Minn.	Closed for enrollment	View complete study & contact information
Jacksonville, Fla.	Closed for enrollment
Scottsdale/Phoenix, Ariz.	Closed for enrollment

Print study details

Site IRB:
- Rochester, Minnesota: 19-003207
- Jacksonville, Florida: 19-003207
- Scottsdale/Phoenix, Arizona: 19-003207
NCT ID:
NCT03639714
Sponsor Protocol Number:
GO-004

Study of ASTX727 vs IV Decitabine in MDS and CMML

Rochester, MN
- See Details
Study of ASTX727 vs IV Decitabine in MDS and CMML
- Study type:
  Interventional
  Describes the nature of a clinical study. Types include:
  
  Observational study — observes people and measures outcomes without affecting results.
  
  Interventional study (clinical trial) — studies new tests, treatments, drugs, surgical procedures or devices.
  
  Medical records research — uses historical information collected from medical records of large groups of people to study how diseases progress and which treatments and surgeries work best.
- Study phase:
  3
  During the early phases (phases 1 and 2), researchers assess safety, side effects, optimal dosages and risks/benefits. In the later phase (phase 3), researchers study whether the treatment works better than the current standard therapy. They also compare the safety of the new treatment with that of current treatments. Phase 3 trials include large numbers of people to make sure that the result is valid. There are also less common very early (phase 0) and later (phase 4) phases. Phase 0 trials are small trials that help researchers decide if a new agent should be tested in a phase 1 trial. Phase 4 trials look at long-term safety and effectiveness, after a new treatment has been approved and is on the market.
About this study

Multicenter, randomized, open-label, crossover PK study of ASTX727 versus IV decitabine. Adult subjects who are candidates to receive IV decitabine will be randomized 1:1 to receive the ASTX727 tablet Daily×5 in Cycle 1 followed by IV decitabine 20 mg/m^2 Daily×5 in Cycle 2, or the converse order. After completion of PK studies during the first 2 treatment cycles, subjects will continue to receive treatment with ASTX727 from Cycle 3 onward (in 28-day cycles) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or the subject discontinues treatment or withdraws from the study.

Participating Mayo Clinic locations

Study statuses change often. Please contact us for help.

Mayo Clinic Location Status Contact

Rochester, Minn.

Closed for enrollment
View complete study & contact information

Print study details
Site IRB:
Rochester, Minnesota: 18-002326

NCT ID:
NCT03306264

Sponsor Protocol Number:
ASTX727-02
A Study Evaluating the Effectiveness and Safety of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel in Subjects with High-Risk Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Rochester, MN
- See Details
A Study Evaluating the Effectiveness and Safety of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel in Subjects with High-Risk Large B-Cell Lymphoma
- Study type:
  Interventional
  Describes the nature of a clinical study. Types include:
  
  Observational study — observes people and measures outcomes without affecting results.
  
  Interventional study (clinical trial) — studies new tests, treatments, drugs, surgical procedures or devices.
  
  Medical records research — uses historical information collected from medical records of large groups of people to study how diseases progress and which treatments and surgeries work best.
- Study phase:
  2
  During the early phases (phases 1 and 2), researchers assess safety, side effects, optimal dosages and risks/benefits. In the later phase (phase 3), researchers study whether the treatment works better than the current standard therapy. They also compare the safety of the new treatment with that of current treatments. Phase 3 trials include large numbers of people to make sure that the result is valid. There are also less common very early (phase 0) and later (phase 4) phases. Phase 0 trials are small trials that help researchers decide if a new agent should be tested in a phase 1 trial. Phase 4 trials look at long-term safety and effectiveness, after a new treatment has been approved and is on the market.
About this study

The purpose of this study is to to estimate the effectiveness of axicabtagene ciloleucel, as measured by complete response (CR) rate, in subjects with high-risk large B-cell lymphoma.

Participating Mayo Clinic locations

Study statuses change often. Please contact us for help.

Mayo Clinic Location Status Contact

Rochester, Minn.

Closed for enrollment
View complete study & contact information

Print study details
Site IRB:
Rochester, Minnesota: 18-008398

NCT ID:
NCT03761056

Sponsor Protocol Number:
KTE-C19-112

Comparison of Combination Chemotherapy Regimens With or Without Cetuximab in Treating Patients Who Have Undergone Surgery For Stage III Colon Cancer

Scottsdale/Phoenix, AZ, Jacksonville, FL, Rochester, MN

See Details

Comparison of Combination Chemotherapy Regimens With or Without Cetuximab in Treating Patients Who Have Undergone Surgery For Stage III Colon Cancer

Study type:
Interventional
Describes the nature of a clinical study. Types include:
- Observational study — observes people and measures outcomes without affecting results.
- Interventional study (clinical trial) — studies new tests, treatments, drugs, surgical procedures or devices.
- Medical records research — uses historical information collected from medical records of large groups of people to study how diseases progress and which treatments and surgeries work best.
Study phase:
3
During the early phases (phases 1 and 2), researchers assess safety, side effects, optimal dosages and risks/benefits. In the later phase (phase 3), researchers study whether the treatment works better than the current standard therapy. They also compare the safety of the new treatment with that of current treatments. Phase 3 trials include large numbers of people to make sure that the result is valid. There are also less common very early (phase 0) and later (phase 4) phases. Phase 0 trials are small trials that help researchers decide if a new agent should be tested in a phase 1 trial. Phase 4 trials look at long-term safety and effectiveness, after a new treatment has been approved and is on the market.

About this study

This randomized phase III trial was originally designed to compare three different combination chemotherapy regimens to see how well they work. As of September 1, 2004, the study was expanded to a total of 6 arms (the original 3 arms (A, B, C) and 3 additional arms which were the same as the first 3 but with cetuximab) in treating patients who have undergone surgery for stage III colon cancer. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as irinotecan hydrochloride, fluorouracil, leucovorin calcium, and oxaliplatin, work in different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Monoclonal antibodies such as cetuximab can locate tumor cells and either kill them or deliver tumor-killing substances to them without harming normal cells. Combining more than one chemotherapy drug with monoclonal antibody therapy and giving them after surgery may kill any remaining tumor cells. It was not known at the time this study was developed which combination chemotherapy regimen is more effective after surgery in treating colon cancer. This study had several key changes, based on the results of other phase III trials. As of 6/1/2005, patients no longer received irinotecan on this study and treatment arms B, C, E, and F were discontinued. Patients on arms B and C crossed to arm A. Patients on arms E and F crossed to arm D. Patients on arms C and F who had not gotten to irinotecan continued on arms A and D, respectively. As of 8/18/2008, pre-screening for Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) status was added with mutant KRAS (or KRAS not evaluable) patients put on arm G and wild-type KRAS patients randomized between arm A and arm D. Patients on arm G were treated per physician discretion and followed for disease and survival status. KRAS was determined in a central laboratory and was process for all patients on this study. The primary endpoint of this study was modified on 8/18/2008 to focus on patients having wild-type KRAS tumors. All modifications were approved by the Central Institution Review Board, local Institutional Review Boards, NCI, and the NCCTG Data Safety Monitoring Board.

Participating Mayo Clinic locations

Study statuses change often. Please contact us for help.

Mayo Clinic Location	Status	Contact
Rochester, Minn.	Closed for enrollment	View complete study & contact information
Jacksonville, Fla.	Closed for enrollment
Scottsdale/Phoenix, Ariz.	Closed for enrollment

Print study details

Site IRB:
- Rochester, Minnesota: 5-04
- Jacksonville, Florida: 5-04
- Scottsdale/Phoenix, Arizona: 5-04
NCT ID:
NCT00079274, NCT00170092
Sponsor Protocol Number:
N0147

A Study Comparing Gemcitabine with or without AZD 1775 in Treating Patients with Recurrent Ovarian, Primary Peritoneal, or Fallopian Tube Cancer

Rochester, MN
- See Details
A Study Comparing Gemcitabine with or without AZD 1775 in Treating Patients with Recurrent Ovarian, Primary Peritoneal, or Fallopian Tube Cancer
- Study type:
  Interventional
  Describes the nature of a clinical study. Types include:
  
  Observational study — observes people and measures outcomes without affecting results.
  
  Interventional study (clinical trial) — studies new tests, treatments, drugs, surgical procedures or devices.
  
  Medical records research — uses historical information collected from medical records of large groups of people to study how diseases progress and which treatments and surgeries work best.
- Study phase:
  2
  During the early phases (phases 1 and 2), researchers assess safety, side effects, optimal dosages and risks/benefits. In the later phase (phase 3), researchers study whether the treatment works better than the current standard therapy. They also compare the safety of the new treatment with that of current treatments. Phase 3 trials include large numbers of people to make sure that the result is valid. There are also less common very early (phase 0) and later (phase 4) phases. Phase 0 trials are small trials that help researchers decide if a new agent should be tested in a phase 1 trial. Phase 4 trials look at long-term safety and effectiveness, after a new treatment has been approved and is on the market.
About this study

The purpose of this study is to compare gemcitabine hydrochloride in combination with AZD 1775 to gemcitabine hydrochloride given alone to treat patients with ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer that has returned after a period of time. Gemcitabine hydrochloride may prevent tumor cells from multiplying by damaging their deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) molecules that contain instructions for the proper development and functioning of cells, which in turn stops the tumor from growing. AZD 1775 may block specific protein activity and may increase the effectiveness of gemcitabine hydrochloride by preventing the protein from repairing damaged tumor cells without causing harm to normal cells. It is not yet known whether gemcitabine hydrochloride with or without AZD1775 may be an effective treatment for recurrent ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer.

Participating Mayo Clinic locations

Study statuses change often. Please contact us for help.

Mayo Clinic Location Status Contact

Rochester, Minn.

Closed for enrollment
View complete study & contact information

Print study details
Site IRB:
Rochester, Minnesota: 15-006212

NCT ID:
NCT02101775

Sponsor Protocol Number:
PHL-093

Pagination Clinical studies

Clinical Trials

Filter Results

Locations

Study status

Gender

Age

Healthy Volunteer

Study phase

Search Results 1821-1830 of 2490 for

Evaluation of CRS-207 With Pembrolizumab in Previously Treated MPM

Smoking Cessation Prior to Surgery to Reduce Surgical Complications in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Lung Cancer Who Smoke Cigarettes

A Study to Evaluate Tazemetostat and Pembrolizumab to Treat Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma

A Study to Evaluate Gemcitabine Hydrochloride and Cisplatin With or Without Nab-Paclitaxel in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Advanced Biliary Tract Cancers

A Study of Preventive Treatment of Oxaliplatin Induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (POLAR-M)

A Study of a Personalized Neoantigen Cancer Vaccine

Study of ASTX727 vs IV Decitabine in MDS and CMML

A Study Evaluating the Effectiveness and Safety of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel in Subjects with High-Risk Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Comparison of Combination Chemotherapy Regimens With or Without Cetuximab in Treating Patients Who Have Undergone Surgery For Stage III Colon Cancer

A Study Comparing Gemcitabine with or without AZD 1775 in Treating Patients with Recurrent Ovarian, Primary Peritoneal, or Fallopian Tube Cancer

Mayo Clinic Footer

Legal Conditions and Terms

Advertising

Reprint Permissions