Clinical Trials

Filter by condition

57 studies in Division of Hematology Research

  1. A Phase 1 and Pharmacokinetic Single Agent Study of Romidepsin in Patients With Lymphomas, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Select Solid Tumors and Varying Degrees of Liver Dysfunction

    Rochester, Minn. View Summary

    A Phase 1 and Pharmacokinetic Single Agent Study of Romidepsin in Patients With Lymphomas, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Select Solid Tumors and Varying Degrees of Liver Dysfunction

    Location:

    Rochester, Minn.

    Trial status:

    Open for Enrollment

    Why is this study being done?

    PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To establish the safety and tolerability of romidepsin given on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28 day cycle to patients with varying degrees of liver dysfunction (mild, moderate and severe). II. To establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and appropriate dosing recommendations for romidepsin in such patients. III. To characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) of romidepsin in patients with varying degrees of liver dysfunction. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To explore correlations of the Child-Pugh classification of liver dysfunction with the observed toxicities and plasma PK of romidepsin administration. II. To document any preliminary evidence of antitumor activity at tolerable doses of romidepsin in patients with varying degrees of liver dysfunction. OUTLINE: This is a dose-escalation study. Patients receive romidepsin intravenously (IV) over 4 hours on days 1, 8, and 15. Courses repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up for 30 days.

    NCT ID:

    NCT01638533

    IRB Number:

    11-007228

    Who can I contact for additional information about this study?

    Rochester: Paul Haluska 507-284-2511
                        


  2. A Phase I/II Study of the Histone Deacetylase (HDAC) Inhibitor LBH589 (Panobinostat) in Combination With mTOR Inhibitor RAD001 (Everolimus) in Patients With Relapsed Multiple Myeloma or Lymphoma

    Rochester, Minn. View Summary

    A Phase I/II Study of the Histone Deacetylase (HDAC) Inhibitor LBH589 (Panobinostat) in Combination With mTOR Inhibitor RAD001 (Everolimus) in Patients With Relapsed Multiple Myeloma or Lymphoma

    Location:

    Rochester, Minn.

    Trial status:

    Open for Enrollment

    Why is this study being done?

    PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine the maximum tolerated doses (MTD) of LBH589 (panobinostat) and RAD001 (everolimus) when used in combination in patients with myeloma or lymphoma. (Phase I) II. To evaluate the therapeutic activity of the combination of LBH589 with RAD001 in patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoma. (Arm A, phase II) III. To evaluate the therapeutic activity of the combination of LBH589 with RAD001 in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. (Arm B, phase II) SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To describe the toxicities associated with the combination of LBH589 with RAD001. (Phase I) II. To further describe the toxicities associated with the combination of LBH589 with RAD001 in each arm independently. (Phase II) III. To evaluate overall survival, progression-free survival, and duration of response in each arm independently. (Phase II) TERTIARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate the pharmacokinetic interaction of LBH589 and RAD001. II. To assess the correlation between clinical (toxicity and/or tumor response or activity) effects with the pharmacologic (pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic) parameters, and/or biologic (correlative laboratory) results. OUTLINE: This is a phase I, dose-escalation study of panobinostat and everolimus followed by a phase II study. (dose-escalation closed to accrual as of April 6, 2011) Patients receive panobinostat orally (PO) once daily (QD) or on days 1, 3, 5, 15, 17, and 19 and everolimus PO QD on days 1-28. Courses repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up for 2 years.

    NCT ID:

    NCT00918333

    IRB Number:

    08-004746

    Who can I contact for additional information about this study?

    Rochester: Shaji K. Kumar 507-284-2511
                        


  3. A Phase 1b/2a, Open-label, Non-randomized Study of Birinapant in Combination With 5-azacitidine in Subjects With Myelodysplastic Syndrome Who Are Naïve, Refractory or Have Relapsed to 5-azacitidine Therapy

    Jacksonville, Fla., Phoenix/Scottsdale, Ariz. View Summary

    A Phase 1b/2a, Open-label, Non-randomized Study of Birinapant in Combination With 5-azacitidine in Subjects With Myelodysplastic Syndrome Who Are Naïve, Refractory or Have Relapsed to 5-azacitidine Therapy

    Location:

    Jacksonville, Fla., Phoenix/Scottsdale, Ariz.

    Trial status:

    Open for Enrollment

    Why is this study being done?

    This is a Phase 1b/2a, open-label, non-randomized study in male and female subjects with MDS who are naïve, refractory or have relapsed to 5-Azacitidine therapy. Primary Objective is to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended Phase 2 dose, and pharmacodynamics (PD) of birinapant (TL32711) when administered in combination with 5-azacitidine (5 AZA) in subjects with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) who are naïve, refractory or have relapsed to 5-AZA therapy. Secondary Objectives are to determine the clinical activity using the International Working Group (IWG) (Cheson, 2006) Response Criteria for MDS during the Phase 1b dose escalation stage of the study and in the Phase 2a expansion cohort, to determine the pharmacokinetics (PK) of birinapant when administered with 5-AZA in plasma and to assess exploratory translational biomarkers of anti-tumor activity of birinapant in combination therapy.

    NCT ID:

    NCT01828346

    IRB Number:

    13-002910

    Who can I contact for additional information about this study?


    Scottsdale: 480-301-8335
                        
    Jacksonville: 904-953-7292
                        
  4. S1211, A Randomized Phase I/II Study of Optimal Induction Therapy of Bortezomib, Dexamethasone and Lenalidomide With or Without Elotuzumab (NSC-764479) for Newly Diagnosed High Risk Multiple Myeloma (HRMM)

    Jacksonville, Fla. View Summary

    S1211, A Randomized Phase I/II Study of Optimal Induction Therapy of Bortezomib, Dexamethasone and Lenalidomide With or Without Elotuzumab (NSC-764479) for Newly Diagnosed High Risk Multiple Myeloma (HRMM)

    Location:

    Jacksonville, Fla.

    Trial status:

    Open for Enrollment

    Why is this study being done?

    OBJECTIVES: - To determine the appropriate Phase II dose of elotuzumab to use in combination with lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone for patients with multiple myeloma. (Phase I) - To assess whether incorporation of the novel agent elotuzumab into the treatment algorithm of high-risk multiple myeloma (HRMM) will improve progression-free survival (PFS). (Phase II) - To estimate the frequency and severity of toxicities of this treatment strategy in this patient population. OUTLINE: This is a multicenter, phase I, dose-escalation study of elotuzumab, followed by a phase II, randomized study. Patients are stratified according to primary plasma cell leukemia and/or high lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) vs everyone else. Phase I: - Induction: Patients receive bortezomib subcutaneously (SC) or IV on days 1, 4, 8, and 11; lenalidomide orally (PO) once daily on days 1-14; and dexamethasone PO or IV on days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, and 12. Patients also receive elotuzumab IV on days 1, 8, and 15 of courses 1 and 2 and on days 1 and 11 of courses 3-8. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 8 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. - Maintenance: Patients receive bortezomib SC or IV on days 1, 8, and 15; lenalidomide PO once daily on days 1-21; dexamethasone PO on days 1, 8, and 15; and elotuzumab IV on days 1 and 15. Treatment repeats every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Phase II: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. - Arm I: - Induction: Patients receive bortezomib SC or IV on days 1, 4, 8, and 11; lenalidomide PO once daily on days 1-14; and dexamethasone PO or IV on days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, and 12. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 8 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity (patients who received a course of chemotherapy prior to registration will begin protocol treatment with course 2 and receive a total of 7 courses of protocol therapy). - Maintenance: Patients receive bortezomib SC or IV on days 1, 8, and 15; lenalidomide PO once daily on days 1-21; and dexamethasone PO on days 1, 8, and 15. Treatment repeats every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. - Arm II: - Induction: Patients receive bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone as in arm I. Patients also receive elotuzumab IV on days 1, 8, and 15 of courses 1 and 2 and on days 1 and 11 of courses 3-8. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 8 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. - Maintenance: Patients receive bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone as in arm I. Patients also receive elotuzumab IV on days 1 and 15. Treatment repeats every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. After completion of study therapy, patients are followed every 3 months for up to 6 years.

    NCT ID:

    NCT01668719

    IRB Number:

    13-009137

    Who can I contact for additional information about this study?

  5. Phase I/II Study of Veltuzumab Combined With 90Y-Epratuzumab Tetraxetan in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory, Aggressive Non- Hodgkin s Lymphoma

    Rochester, Minn. View Summary

    Phase I/II Study of Veltuzumab Combined With 90Y-Epratuzumab Tetraxetan in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory, Aggressive Non- Hodgkin s Lymphoma

    Location:

    Rochester, Minn.

    Trial status:

    Open for Enrollment

    Why is this study being done?

    The treatment portion of this study consists of study drug administrations each week for four weeks in a row (a total of 4 treatment days). Patients will then return at intervals up to 12 weeks for blood samples and for evaluations to see if their disease responded and to monitor any adverse effects related to treatment. Some blood tests may then need to be repeated at least a few times and/or until any abnormal findings at earlier evaluations have resolved. Otherwise, patients will continue to be evaluated every 3 months for two years, then every 6 months up to 5 years or until the disease worsens. Participation in the study will end when NHL disease worsens.

    NCT ID:

    NCT01101581

    IRB Number:

    10-008298

    Who can I contact for additional information about this study?

    Rochester: Jennifer Jensen, RN
                        


  6. Intergroup Randomized Phase 2 Four Arm Study In Patients ≥ 60 With Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma Of Therapy With: Arm A = Rituximab+ Bendamustine Followed By Rituximab Consolidation (RB → R); Arm B = Rituximab + Bendamustine + Bortezomib Followed By Rituximab Consolidation (RBV→ R), Arm C = Rituximab + Bendamustine Followed By Lenalidomide + Rituximab Consolidation (RB → LR) or Arm D = Rituximab + Bendamustine + Bortezomib Followed By Lenalidomide + Rituximab Consolidation (RBV → LR)

    Rochester, Minn. View Summary

    Intergroup Randomized Phase 2 Four Arm Study In Patients ≥ 60 With Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma Of Therapy With: Arm A = Rituximab+ Bendamustine Followed By Rituximab Consolidation (RB → R); Arm B = Rituximab + Bendamustine + Bortezomib Followed By Rituximab Consolidation (RBV→ R), Arm C = Rituximab + Bendamustine Followed By Lenalidomide + Rituximab Consolidation (RB → LR) or Arm D = Rituximab + Bendamustine + Bortezomib Followed By Lenalidomide + Rituximab Consolidation (RBV → LR)

    Location:

    Rochester, Minn.

    Trial status:

    Open for Enrollment

    Why is this study being done?

    OBJECTIVES: Primary - To determine whether the addition of bortezomib (RBV) to an induction regimen of rituximab-bendamustine hydrochloride (RB) improves progression-free survival (PFS) compared to RB alone in patients ≥ 60 years of age with previously untreated mantle cell lymphoma. - To determine whether the addition of lenalidomide to a consolidation regimen of rituximab following an induction regimen of RB or RBV improves PFS compared to consolidation rituximab alone in this patient population. Secondary - To determine whether the addition of bortezomib to induction therapy improves the positron emission tomography (PET)-documented complete response (CR) rate compared to RB alone. - To determine the objective response rate (ORR) for RB and RBV. - Among patients who do not have PET-documented CR at the end of induction, to determine whether the addition of lenalidomide to consolidation therapy improves CR and ORR compared with rituximab alone. - To determine overall survival (OS) in the treatment arms. - To determine safety, with attention to the addition of bortezomib in the induction regimen and lenalidomide-rituximab (LR) as consolidation therapy. - To collect paraffin-embedded tissue for creation of tissue microarray. - To collect and bank serum and blood mononuclear cells for future studies. - To collect formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue to analyze potential prognostic factors (Ki-67 proliferation index by immunohistochemistry and correlation with proposed 5-gene set of proliferation markers analyzed by RNA PCR; SOX 11 expression by immunohistochemistry; and Micro-RNA levels by microarray). - Using patient-reported outcomes data, to determine the extent and severity of neuropathy associated with the addition of bortezomib to induction treatment. - Using patient-reported outcomes data, to determine the extent and severity of fatigue associated with the addition of lenalidomide to consolidation treatment. - To evaluate the effects of the addition of bortezomib and lenalidomide on patient-reported health-related quality of life. - To evaluate the effects of bortezomib-related neuropathy on patient-reported health-related quality of life. - To evaluate the response of lymphoma-specific symptoms to treatment. - Using longitudinal patient-reported outcomes data, to describe the trajectory of lymphoma symptoms, neuropathy, fatigue, and overall health-related quality of life prior to, during, and following treatment among older adults with MCL. Tertiary - To assess the proportion of patients up and down staging when fludeoxyglucose F 18- (FDG) PET/CT is added to standard Ann Arbor staging. - To assess the ability of pre-treatment FDG-PET/CT (SUVmax) to predict response rate and PFS. - Among patients with interim (post-cycle 3) FDG-PET/CT imaging, to assess the correlation of interim FDG-PET/CT imaging with response rate and PFS both during induction and consolidation therapy. - To assess standard FDG-PET/CT metrics including SUVmax, tumor metabolic burden, total tumor burden, and association with pathology features (blastoid variant vs other, and Ki67) in the setting of MCL. - To assess differences in overall and CR rates when using Deauville vs International Harmonization Project FDG-PET/CT interpretation criteria. - To determine whether there is a correlation between FDG-PET/CT response and residual disease assessment by molecular and/or flow cytometric techniques. - To determine whether the number of malignant cells in circulation predict the number of cells in marrow. - To determine whether the number of malignant cells in circulation/in marrow at the end of induction correlate with CR and 2-year PFS. - To determine whether there is a higher rate of minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity among patients randomized to RBV as compared with RB, and among patients treated with LR maintenance compared with rituximab. - To compare the two methods of MRD detection - molecular techniques and flow cytometry - as prognostic markers for outcome. OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to mantle cell lymphoma International Prognostic Index risk score (low vs intermediate vs high). Patients are randomized to 1 of 4 treatment arms. - Arm A: Patients receive induction therapy comprising rituximab IV on day 1 and bendamustine hydrochloride IV over 60 minutes on days 1-2. Treatment repeats every 4 weeks for 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. - Arm E: Patients receive consolidation therapy comprising rituximab IV on day 1. Courses repeat every 8 weeks for 2 years in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. - Arm B: Patients receive induction therapy comprising bortezomib IV or subcutaneously (SC) on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 and rituximab and bendamustine hydrochloride as patients in arm A. Treatment repeats every 4 weeks for 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. - Arm F: Patients receive consolidation therapy comprising rituximab IV on day 1. Courses repeat every 8 weeks for 2 years in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. - Arm C: Patients receive induction therapy comprising rituximab and bendamustine hydrochloride as patients in arm A. Treatment repeats every 4 weeks for 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. - Arm G: Patients receive consolidation therapy comprising lenalidomide orally (PO) daily on days 1-21 every 4 weeks and rituximab IV every 8 weeks for 2 years in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. - Arm D: Patients receive bortezomib, rituximab, and bendamustine hydrochloride as patients in arm B. Treatment repeats every 4 weeks for 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. - Arm H: Patients receive consolidation therapy comprising lenalidomide PO daily on days 1-21 every 4 weeks and rituximab IV every 8 weeks for 2 years in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients may undergo blood and bone marrow sample collection at baseline and during treatment for correlative studies. Patients complete the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym), the FACT/GOG-Neurotoxicity scale (FACT/GOG-Ntx), FACT-Fatigue, and FACT-General questionnaires at baseline and periodically during study and follow up. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 3 years, and then annually for 10 years.

    NCT ID:

    NCT01415752

    IRB Number:

    12-005758

    Who can I contact for additional information about this study?

    Rochester: Clinical Trials Office - All Mayo Clinic Locations 507-538-7623
                        


  7. A Phase III Randomized Study of Oral Sapacitabine in Elderly Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia

    Rochester, Minn. View Summary

    A Phase III Randomized Study of Oral Sapacitabine in Elderly Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia

    Location:

    Rochester, Minn.

    Trial status:

    Open for Enrollment

    Why is this study being done?

    This is a multicenter, randomized, Phase 3 study comparing two drug regimens (arms) as the front-line treatment of elderly patients aged 70 years or older with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are not candidates for intensive induction chemotherapy. In Arm A, sapacitabine is administered in alternating cycles with decitabine, and in Arm C decitabine is administered alone. The primary efficacy endpoint is overall survival. The study is designed to demonstrate an improvement in overall survival of Arm A versus Arm C.

    NCT ID:

    NCT01303796

    IRB Number:

    11-001508

    Who can I contact for additional information about this study?

    Rochester: Clinical Trials Office 507-538-7623
                        


  8. Phase 1/2 Open-Label, Multiple-Dose, Dose-Escalation Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of SNS01-T Administered by Intravenous Infusion in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory B Cell Malignancies

    Rochester, Minn. View Summary

    Phase 1/2 Open-Label, Multiple-Dose, Dose-Escalation Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of SNS01-T Administered by Intravenous Infusion in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory B Cell Malignancies

    Location:

    Rochester, Minn.

    Trial status:

    Open for Enrollment

    Why is this study being done?

    The main purpose is to test the safety and tolerability of SNS01-T. The first group of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, plasma cell leukemia or B cell lymphoma will be given a relatively low dose. If tolerated, a second group will receive a higher dose. If tolerated by the second group, a third and then a fourth group will receive higher doses. Treatment-related adverse events (side effects), changes in vital signs, physical examination, and laboratory values will be monitored. Patients will receive twice weekly infusions for 6 weeks and then will be followed monthly for 6 months. A secondary purpose is to explore whether SNS01-T is an effective treatment for multiple myeloma, B cell lymphoma and plasma cell leukemia.

    NCT ID:

    NCT01435720

    IRB Number:

    11-002766

    Who can I contact for additional information about this study?

    Rochester: Mayo Clinic Clinical Trials Referral Office 507-538-7623
                        


  9. A Comprehensive Approach to Improve Medication Adherence in Pediatric ALL

    Rochester, Minn. View Summary

    A Comprehensive Approach to Improve Medication Adherence in Pediatric ALL

    Location:

    Rochester, Minn.

    Trial status:

    Open for Enrollment

    Why is this study being done?

    OBJECTIVES: Primary - Determine the impact of the intervention program (IP) on adherence to mercaptopurine (6MP) using the following adherence assessments: Frequency of 6MP dosing using MEMS (primary measure of adherence); 6MP dosage- and thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT)-normalized serial red blood cell (RBC) thioguanine nucleotide (6TGN) levels; and self-report of adherence. Secondary - Examine the modifying effect of socio-demographic and clinical characteristics as well as health beliefs/knowledge on changes in adherence with the IP. OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to ethnic background (Hispanic vs non-Hispanic white vs African-American). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 intervention arms. - Arm I: Patients receive the Patients Supply Kit containing an electronic pill monitoring system, a Medication Event Monitoring Systems (MEMS®) medication bottle with TrackCap™ with standard resistant cap, and written instructions for the patient and pharmacist. Parents and/or caregivers are also trained to supervise patients' intake of the medication. Beginning on day 1, patients start using the MEMS® medication bottle with TrackCap™ . Clinical research assistants contact patients and parents by telephone the next day to confirm that TrackCap™ is being used, to identify any obstacles, and to determine solutions. Beginning on day 29, patients and caregivers view an interactive multimedia educational program on-line or via DVD. Patients also receive a customized electronic mercaptopurine schedule and automated customized text message reminders delivered via cellular phone or web-based interface. Patients and caregivers are instructed to return the MEMS® medication bottle with TrackCap™ to the clinic by day 141. - Arm II: Patients receive the usual standard of care and the mercaptopurine from the MEMS® medication bottle with TrackCap™ as patients in arm I. Patients and parents and/or caregivers in both arms complete the Demographic and the Acculturation Questionnaires on day 1. Patients and/or caregivers in arm I also complete the Adherence Questionnaires on days 29, 57, and 141 and the Intervention Rating Questionnaire on day 141. Blood samples are collected on days 1, 29, 57, and 141 for thiopurine methyltransferase phenotyping and thioguanine nucleotide levels by high-performance chromatography.

    NCT ID:

    NCT01503632

    IRB Number:

    12-004675

    Who can I contact for additional information about this study?

    Rochester: Clinical Trials Office - All Mayo Clinic Locations 507-538-7623
                        


  10. A Phase 3, Randomized, Two-Arm, Open-Label, Multicenter, International Trial of Alisertib (MLN8237) or Investigator's Choice (Selected Single Agent) in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma

    Rochester, Minn. View Summary

    A Phase 3, Randomized, Two-Arm, Open-Label, Multicenter, International Trial of Alisertib (MLN8237) or Investigator's Choice (Selected Single Agent) in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma

    Location:

    Rochester, Minn.

    Trial status:

    Open for Enrollment

    Why is this study being done?

    This is a phase 3, randomized, 2-arm, open-label, international trial evaluating alisertib compared with single-agent treatment, as selected by the investigator from the offered options of pralatrexate or gemcitabine or romidepsin, in patients with relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). Note: romidepsin will not be used as a single-agent comparator in countries that do not permit its use at this time.

    NCT ID:

    NCT01482962

    IRB Number:

    12-004061

    Who can I contact for additional information about this study?

  1. Prev
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. Next