Clinical Trials

Filter by condition

55 studies in Division of Hematology Research

  1. A Randomized Open-Label Trial of Caspofungin Versus Fluconazole to Prevent Invasive Fungal Infections in Children Undergoing Chemotherapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

    Rochester, Minn. View Summary

    A Randomized Open-Label Trial of Caspofungin Versus Fluconazole to Prevent Invasive Fungal Infections in Children Undergoing Chemotherapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

    Location:

    Rochester, Minn.

    Trial status:

    Open for Enrollment

    Why is this study being done?

    PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine if prophylaxis with caspofungin (caspofungin acetate) administered during periods of neutropenia following chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with a lower incidence of proven or probable invasive fungal infections (IFI) compared with fluconazole. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine if prophylaxis with caspofungin will result in a lower incidence of proven or probable cases of invasive aspergillosis (IA) compared with fluconazole. (Clinical) II. To determine if prophylaxis with caspofungin will result in improved survival compared to fluconazole. (Clinical) III. To determine if prophylaxis with caspofungin will result in less empiric antifungal therapy compared to fluconazole. (Clinical) IV. To determine the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value of biweekly galactomannan (GM) and beta-D glucan testing in diagnosing IFI. (Biological) V. To test the association between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes involved in innate immunity and proven or probable IFI. (Biological) VI. To develop predictive models of IFI using SNP in genes involved in immunity and clinical covariates. (Biological) OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. ARM I: Patients receive caspofungin acetate intravenously (IV) over 1 hour once daily (QD) beginning within 24-72 hours following the last dose of chemotherapy for each course and continuing until absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > 100-500/uL following the nadir or the next chemotherapy course begins. ARM II: Patients receive fluconazole IV over 1-2 hours or orally (PO) QD beginning within 24-72 hours following the last dose of chemotherapy for each course and continuing until ANC > 100-500/uL following the nadir or the next chemotherapy course begins. In both arms, treatment continues in the absence of invasive fungal infections or disease progression. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up periodically.

    NCT ID:

    NCT01307579

    IRB Number:

    11-007044

    Who can I contact for additional information about this study?

    Rochester: Carola A. Arndt 507-538-7623
                        


  2. A Phase 1 Study of the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Escalating Oral Doses of the Glutaminase Inhibitor CB-839 in Patients With Advanced and/or Treatment-Refractory Hematological Malignancies

    Phoenix/Scottsdale, Ariz. View Summary

    A Phase 1 Study of the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Escalating Oral Doses of the Glutaminase Inhibitor CB-839 in Patients With Advanced and/or Treatment-Refractory Hematological Malignancies

    Location:

    Phoenix/Scottsdale, Ariz.

    Trial status:

    Open for Enrollment

    Why is this study being done?

    Many tumor cells, in contrast to normal cells, have been shown to require the amino acid glutamine to produce energy for growth and survival. To exploit the dependence of tumors on glutamine, CB-839, a potent and selective inhibitor of the first enzyme in glutamine utilization, glutaminase, will be tested in this Phase 1 study in patients with advanced hematologic malignancies. This study is an open-label Phase 1 evaluation of CB-839 in subjects with hematological tumors. Patients will receive CB-839 capsules orally three times daily. The study will be conducted in 2 parts. Part 1 is a dose escalation study to identify the recommended Phase 2 dose. In Part 2, all patients will receive the recommended Phase 2 dose. Both Parts 1 and 2 will enroll patients with advanced and/or treatment-refractory Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL), Multiple Myeloma (MM), or Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM). All patients will be assessed for safety, pharmacokinetics (plasma concentration of drug), pharmacodynamics (inhibition of glutaminase), biomarkers (biochemical markers that may predict responsiveness in later studies), and tumor response.

    NCT ID:

    NCT02071888

    IRB Number:

    14-000452

    Who can I contact for additional information about this study?


    Scottsdale: Clinical Trials Office - All Mayo Clinic Locations 507-538-7623
                        

  3. Treatment of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Standard Risk B-Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)

    Rochester, Minn. View Summary

    Treatment of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Standard Risk B-Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)

    Location:

    Rochester, Minn.

    Trial status:

    Open for Enrollment

    Why is this study being done?

    PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: l. To determine if a maintenance regimen containing once weekly oral methotrexate at 40 mg/m^2/week will result in an improved disease-free survival (DFS) compared to that containing weekly oral methotrexate at 20 mg/m^2/week in the average-risk (AR) subset of pediatric patients with standard-risk (SR) B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). II. To determine whether a reduced-pulses maintenance regimen with vincristine sulfate/dexamethasone pulses delivered every 12 weeks can be used without adversely impacting DFS as compared to pulses given every 4 weeks in the AR subset of patients with SR B-precursor ALL. III. To confirm that patients in the low-risk (LR) subset of SR B-precursor ALL, based on clinical and cytogenetic features and minimal residual disease (MRD) criteria, can attain a 5-year DFS of at least 95% with either a P9904-based regimen that includes 6 courses of intermediate dose (1 g/m^2 over 24 hours) methotrexate without alkylating agents or anthracyclines (Arm LR-M), or an outpatient-based regimen identical to that of AR patients with reduced vincristine sulfate/dexamethasone pulses at 12-week intervals during maintenance (Arm LR-C). IV. To provide standardized treatment and enhanced supportive care to children with SR Down syndrome-ALL in order to improve outcomes and facilitate further study of this biologically and clinically unique patient subgroup. V. To improve understanding of the biology of localized B-LLy and DS B-LLy by obtaining biologic data, including FISH for recurrent cytogenetic lesions on paraffin specimen, and banking tissue for future research. VI. To describe the 5-year EFS and overall survival (OS) of patients with Murphy Stage I and II B-LLy receiving modified AR B-ALL therapy. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To assess the burden of AR-ALL therapy as measured by surveys of the child's quality of life, missed days of school/daycare/work by children and parents, family functioning, parental perception of the child's health vulnerability, physical functioning, and emotional distress overall at different time points during and at the end of therapy. II. To assess the burden of AR-ALL therapy as measured by surveys of the child's quality of life, missed days of school/daycare/work by children and parents, family functioning, parental perception of the child's health vulnerability, physical functioning, and emotional distress by comparing children randomized to every 4-week vs every 12-week dexamethasone/vincristine sulfate pulses during maintenance therapy. III. To characterize the onset, severity, and natural history of vincristine associated neuropathy by physical therapists (or occupational therapists) in children undergoing therapy for AR-ALL, 1) overall at different time points during and at the end of therapy, and by 2) comparing children randomized to every 4 week vs. every 12 week dexamethasone/vincristine pulses during Maintenance. IV. To characterize the onset, severity, and natural history of vincristine associated neuropathy by physical therapists (or occupational therapists) in children undergoing therapy for AR B-ALL, 1) overall at different time points during and at the end of therapy, and by 2) comparing children randomized to every 4 week vs. every 12 week dexamethasone/vincristine pulses during Maintenance. V. To explore the correlation of minimal marrow disease (MMD) at diagnosis and outcome for patients with B-LLy. OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. All patients receive induction therapy comprising intrathecal (IT) cytarabine on day 1; vincristine sulfate IV on days 1, 8, 15, and 22; dexamethasone orally or IV twice daily (BID) on days 1-28; pegaspargase IV over 1-2 hours on day 4; and IT methotrexate* on days 8 and 29. Patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive disease are eligible to transfer to COG-AALL0622 by day 15 of induction therapy and patients with high-risk (HR) or very high-risk (VHR) disease are eligible to transfer to a COG HR or VHR trial at the end of induction therapy. Patients with standard-risk disease with Down syndrome (DS) who have bone marrow minimal residual disease 0.01% are eligible to transfer to the DS stratum of the HR trial. Patients with induction failure (defined as M3 [> 25% lymphoblasts] on day 29) may be eligible for the COG VHR-acute lymphoblastic leukemia study. NOTE: *Patients with DS also receive oral leucovorin calcium every 12 hours on days 10-11 and 31-32. STANDARD-RISK WITH DOWN SYNDROME: Consolidation therapy (4 weeks): Patients receive vincristine sulfate IV on day 1; oral mercaptopurine on days 1-28; IT methotrexate on days 1, 8, and 15; and oral leucovorin calcium every 12 hours on days 3-4, 10-11, and 17-18. Interim maintenance I therapy (8 weeks): Patients receive vincristine sulfate IV and methotrexate IV over 2-15 minutes on days 1, 11, 21, 31, and 41; IT methotrexate on day 31; and oral leucovorin calcium every 12 hours on days 36-34. Delayed-intensification therapy (8 weeks): Patients receive dexamethasone orally or IV BID on days 1-7 and 15-21; vincristine sulfate IV and doxorubicin hydrochloride IV over 1-15 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15; pegaspargase IV over 1-2 hours on day 4; cyclophosphamide IV over 30-60 minutes on day 29; oral thioguanine on days 29-42; cytarabine IV over 1-15 minutes or subcutaneously (SC) on days 29-32 and 33-39; IT methotrexate on days 1 and 29; and oral leucovorin calcium every 12 hours on days 3-4 and 31-32. Interim maintenance II therapy (8 weeks): Patients receive vincristine sulfate IV and methotrexate IV over 2-15 minutes on days 1, 11, 21, 31, and 41; IT methotrexate on days 1 and 31; and oral leucovorin calcium every 12 hours on days 3-4 and 33-34. Maintenance therapy: Patients receive vincristine sulfate IV on day 1; oral dexamethasone BID on days 1-5; oral methotrexate on days 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 43, 50, 57, 64, 71, and 78; oral mercaptopurine on days 1-84; and IT methotrexate on day 1. Courses repeat every 12 weeks for 2 years (timed from the start of interim maintenance I therapy). AVERAGE-RISK: Consolidation therapy (4 weeks): Patients receive vincristine sulfate IV on day 1; oral mercaptopurine on days 1-28; and IT methotrexate on days 1, 8, and 15.Interim maintenance I therapy (8 weeks): Patients receive vincristine sulfate IV and methotrexate IV over 2-15 minutes on days 1, 11, 21, 31, and 41 and IT methotrexate on day 31. Delayed intensification therapy (8 weeks): Patients receive dexamethasone orally or IV BID on days 1-7 and 15-21; vincristine sulfate IV and doxorubicin hydrochloride IV over 1-15 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15; pegaspargase IV over 1-2 hours on day 4; cyclophosphamide IV over 30-60 minutes on day 29; oral thioguanine on days 29-42; cytarabine IV over 15-30 minutes or SC on days 29-32 and 36-39; and IT methotrexate on days 1 and 29. Interim maintenance II therapy (8 weeks): Patients receive vincristine sulfate IV and methotrexate IV over 2-15 minutes on days 1, 11, 21, 31, and 41 and IT methotrexate on days 1 and 31. Maintenance therapy: Patients are randomized to 1 of 4 maintenance therapy treatment arms. Arm A: Patients receive vincristine sulfate IV on days 1, 29, and 57; oral dexamethasone BID on days 1-5, 29-33, and 57-61; oral methotrexate on days 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 43, 50, 57, 64, 71, and 78; oral mercaptopurine on days 1-84; and IT methotrexate on day 1. Arm B: Patients receive vincristine sulfate IV on days 1, 29, and 57; oral dexamethasone BID on days 1-5, 29-33, and 57-61; higher-dose oral methotrexate on days 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 43, 50, 57, 64, 71, and 78; oral mercaptopurine on days 1-84; and IT methotrexate on day 1. Arm C: Patients receive vincristine sulfate IV on day 1; oral dexamethasone BID on days 1-5; oral methotrexate on days 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 43, 50, 57, 64, 71, and 78; oral mercaptopurine on days 1-84; and IT methotrexate on day 1. Arm D: Patients receive vincristine sulfate IV on day 1; oral dexamethasone BID on days 1-5; higher-dose oral methotrexate on days 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 43, 50, 57, 64, 71, and 78; oral mercaptopurine on days 1-84; and IT methotrexate on day 1. In all arms, maintenance therapy courses repeat every 12 weeks for 2 years for girls and for 3 years for boys (timed from the start of interim maintenance I therapy). LOW-RISK: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. Arm I (LR-M): Consolidation therapy (19 weeks): Beginning one week after completion of induction therapy, patients receive vincristine sulfate IV on days 15, 22, 78, and 85; methotrexate IV over 24 hours and IT methotrexate on days 8, 29, 50, 71, 92, and 113; leucovorin calcium orally or IV on days 9-10, 30-31, 51-52, 72-73, 93-94, and 114-115; dexamethasone orally or IV BID on days 15-21 and 78-84; and oral mercaptopurine on days 1-133.Maintenance therapy: Patients receive vincristine sulfate IV on days 1 and 8; oral dexamethasone BID on days 1-7; oral methotrexate* on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 43, 50, 57, 64, 71, 78, 85, 92, 99, and 106; and oral mercaptopurine on days 1-112. Courses repeat every 16 weeks. Patients also receive IT methotrexate on days 1 and 85 (courses 1 and 4), day 57 (courses 2 and 5), or day 29 (courses 3 and 6). Patients then receive course 7 comprising vincristine sulfate IV on days 1 and 8; oral dexamethasone BID on days 1-7; oral methotrexate on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 43, 50, 57, and 64; and oral mercaptopurine on days 1-70. Treatment continues for 2 and ½ years (timed from the date of diagnosis).NOTE: *Patients do not receive oral methotrexate on the days that they receive IT methotrexate. Arm II (LR-C): Consolidation therapy (4 weeks): Patients receive vincristine sulfate IV on day 1; oral mercaptopurine on days 1-28; and IT methotrexate on days 1, 8, and 15. Interim maintenance I therapy (8 weeks): Patients receive vincristine sulfate IV and methotrexate IV over 2-15 minutes on days 1, 11, 21, 31, and 41 and IT methotrexate on day 31. Delayed-intensification therapy (8 weeks): Patients receive dexamethasone orally or IV BID on days 1-7 and 15-21; vincristine sulfate IV and doxorubicin hydrochloride IV over 1-15 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15; pegaspargase IV over 1-2 hours on day 4; cyclophosphamide IV over 30-60 minutes on day 29; oral thioguanine on days 29-42; cytarabine IV over 1-15 minutes or SC on days 29-32 and 36-39; and IT methotrexate on days 1 and 29.Interim maintenance II therapy (8 weeks): Patients receive vincristine sulfate IV and methotrexate IV over 2-15 minutes on days 1, 11, 21, 31, and 41 and IT methotrexate on days 1 and 31. Maintenance therapy: Patients receive vincristine sulfate IV on day 1; oral dexamethasone BID on days 1-5; oral methotrexate on days 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 43, 50, 57, 64, 71, and 78; oral mercaptopurine on days 1-84; and IT methotrexate on day 1. Courses repeat every 12 weeks for 2 years for girls and for 3 years for boys (timed from the start of interim maintenance I therapy). Blood samples may be collected periodically for research studies and patients may complete quality-of-life surveys periodically. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up periodically for 10 years.

    NCT ID:

    NCT01190930

    IRB Number:

    10-005606

    Who can I contact for additional information about this study?

    Rochester: Vilmarie Rodriguez 507-538-7623
                        


  4. Open-label Study to Assess the Long-term Safety and Efficacy of Momelotinib in Subjects With Primary Myelofibrosis, Post-polycythemia Vera Myelofibrosis, Post Essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis, Polycythemia Vera or Essential Thrombocythemia

    Rochester, Minn., Jacksonville, Fla., Phoenix/Scottsdale, Ariz. View Summary

    Open-label Study to Assess the Long-term Safety and Efficacy of Momelotinib in Subjects With Primary Myelofibrosis, Post-polycythemia Vera Myelofibrosis, Post Essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis, Polycythemia Vera or Essential Thrombocythemia

    Location:

    Rochester, Minn., Jacksonville, Fla., Phoenix/Scottsdale, Ariz.

    Trial status:

    Open for Enrollment

    Why is this study being done?

    This open-label study is to determine the long-term safety and tolerability of momelotinib in previously enrolled study participants with primary myelofibrosis (PMF), post-polycythemia vera myelofibrosis (post-PV MF), post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis (post-ET MF), polycythemia vera (PV), or essential thrombocythemia (ET), who have tolerated and achieved stable disease or better with momelotinib treatment while enrolled in a previous clinical trial.

    NCT ID:

    NCT02124746

    IRB Number:

    14-001644

    Who can I contact for additional information about this study?

  5. Randomized Phase III Trial of Lenalidomide Versus Observation Alone in Patients With Asymptomatic High-Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma

    Rochester, Minn. View Summary

    Randomized Phase III Trial of Lenalidomide Versus Observation Alone in Patients With Asymptomatic High-Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma

    Location:

    Rochester, Minn.

    Trial status:

    Open for Enrollment

    Why is this study being done?

    PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To study the risk of grade 3 adverse events that effect vital organ function (such as cardiac, hepatic or thromboembolic) or any grade 4 or higher non-hematologic adverse events among patients receiving lenalidomide as treatment for high-risk asymptomatic, smoldering multiple myeloma. (Phase II) II. To compare progression free survival where failure is defined as death or the development of symptomatic myeloma indicating treatment between patients receiving lenalidomide versus observation alone in high-risk asymptomatic, smoldering multiple myeloma. (Phase III) SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To assess the response to therapy of patients treated with lenalidomide as treatment for asymptomatic, smoldering multiple myeloma. (Phase II) II. To determine and compare the response rate, time to progression, 1-year progression-free survival probability, and overall survival between patients randomized to receive lenalidomide or observation in the setting of asymptomatic myeloma. (Phase III) III. To estimate the incidence of adverse events in patients receiving lenalidomide therapy for early-stage multiple myeloma. (Phase III) TERTIARY OBJECTIVES: I. To describe the cohort in terms of gene expression profiling (GEP) and cytogenetic risk classification and evaluate baseline immune and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters. (Phase II) II. To evaluate the impact of therapy within GEP-defined risk groups and GEP as a prognostic marker. (Phase III) III. To study the effects of lenalidomide on laboratory markers of immune function. (Phase III) IV. To study the prognostic value of MRI-detected asymptomatic bone disease on clinical outcome. (Phase III V. To evaluate the prognostic effect of baseline high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities on clinical outcome. (Phase III) QUATERNARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare quality of life (QOL) change between treatment and observation arms based on the functional (FWB) and physical (PWB) well-being components of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)-General (G) patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure from registration (prior to initiation of treatment) up to cycle 24. II. To examine the impact of differential treatment response (PFS), if observed, on QOL based on the FACT FWB+PWB up to cycle 48. III. To obtain prospective data on myeloma specific QOL attributes, utilizing and evaluating the Multiple Myeloma Subscale (MMS). OUTLINE: PHASE II: Patients receive lenalidomide orally (PO) once daily (QD) on days 1-21. Courses repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. PHASE III: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. ARM A: Patients receive lenalidomide PO QD on days 1-21. Courses repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. ARM B: Patients undergo observation until progression to symptomatic myeloma. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 3 years, and then every 12 months for 5 years.

    NCT ID:

    NCT01169337

    IRB Number:

    10-007153

    Who can I contact for additional information about this study?

    Rochester: John A. Lust 507-538-7623
                        
    Scottsdale: John A. Lust 507-538-7623
                        

  6. S1304, A Phase II Randomized Study Comparing Two Doses of Carfilzomib (NSC-756640) With Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Disease

    Jacksonville, Fla. View Summary

    S1304, A Phase II Randomized Study Comparing Two Doses of Carfilzomib (NSC-756640) With Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Disease

    Location:

    Jacksonville, Fla.

    Trial status:

    Open for Enrollment

    Why is this study being done?

    PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate and compare progression free survival (PFS) of two different doses of carfilzomib with dexamethasone in multiple myeloma (MM) patients with relapsed and/or refractory disease. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate and compare response rates (RR) for each arm. II. To evaluate response rates (RR) for patients that relapse on low dose carfilzomib and subsequently cross-over to high dose carfilzomib. III. To evaluate the safety of this combination for this patient population. IV. To evaluate overall survival (OS). TERTIARY OBJECTIVES: I. To explore the molecular variability in MM cells obtained from extramedullary bone marrow relapse sites. II. To explore the role of positron emission tomography (PET) scanning in assessing disease burden and as a tool to assess treatment response. III. To explore changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma treated with low dose carfilzomib or high dose carfilzomib plus dexamethasone. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. ARM I: Patients receive dexamethasone intravenously (IV) and low-dose carfilzomib IV over 2-10 minutes on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16. Patients with progression cross-over to Arm II. ARM II: Patients receive dexamethasone IV and high-dose carfilzomib IV over 30 minutes on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16. Note that for the first course of treatment on both arms carfilzomib is given at a reduced rate to assess toxicity. In both arms, treatment repeats every 28 days for up to 12 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up for 3 years from initial registration.

    NCT ID:

    NCT01903811

    IRB Number:

    13-009138

    Who can I contact for additional information about this study?

  7. A Post Approval Registry: ExAblate Treatment of Metastatic Bone Tumors for the Palliation of Pain

    Rochester, Minn. View Summary

    A Post Approval Registry: ExAblate Treatment of Metastatic Bone Tumors for the Palliation of Pain

    Location:

    Rochester, Minn.

    Trial status:

    Open for Enrollment

    Why is this study being done?

    This proposed Registry will be performed in full compliance with all HIPAA rules and their implementations at potential participating sites. All patients planned to undergo the ExAblate procedure in a commercial setting after PMA approval will be offered a consent so they can be included in the ESS. Non-consenting patients will not be included in the ESS. However, information regarding the total number of subjects treated at each participating site with the device will also be collected. InSightec will set up a (password protected) EDC database for the sites to enter the information of participating subjects treated with the ExAblate device from all U.S. sites using the ExAblate procedure for the bone metastases indication. This will occur for a total duration of 2 years following device approval. It should be noted that any adverse event that meets the Medical Device Report ("MDR") definition will be reported as an MDR as well. There will be no control group. Reporting to FDA will occur at six-month intervals for the first two-years after PMA approval.

    NCT ID:

    NCT01834937

    IRB Number:

    13-000799

    Who can I contact for additional information about this study?

    Rochester: Connie Sathre 507-538-0540
                        


  8. A Phase 2, Open-label, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Momelotinib in Subjects With Polycythemia Vera or Essential Thrombocythemia

    Phoenix/Scottsdale, Ariz. View Summary

    A Phase 2, Open-label, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Momelotinib in Subjects With Polycythemia Vera or Essential Thrombocythemia

    Location:

    Phoenix/Scottsdale, Ariz.

    Trial status:

    Open for Enrollment

    Why is this study being done?

    This open-label study is to determine the safety and efficacy of momelotinib in participants with either polycythemia vera (PV) or essential thrombocythemia (ET) who have not yet received treatment with a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor.

    NCT ID:

    NCT01998828

    IRB Number:

    14-000756

    Who can I contact for additional information about this study?

  9. A Phase 1/2 Dose Escalation Study to Determine the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Intravenous TKM-080301 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors

    Rochester, Minn., Phoenix/Scottsdale, Ariz. View Summary

    A Phase 1/2 Dose Escalation Study to Determine the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Intravenous TKM-080301 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors

    Location:

    Rochester, Minn., Phoenix/Scottsdale, Ariz.

    Trial status:

    Open for Enrollment

    Why is this study being done?

    This study will be a Phase I/II, open-label, non-randomized, dose-finding trial conducted at multiple clinical centers. The study is designed to determine the safety, tolerability and PK of TKM-080301 in adult patients with solid tumors or lymphomas that are refractory to standard therapy or for whom there is no standard therapy. After the determination of the maximum tolerated dose this dose will be utilized in an expansion cohort or subjects with refractory neuroendocrine tumors (NET) or adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) tumors.

    NCT ID:

    NCT01262235

    IRB Number:

    11-000470

    Who can I contact for additional information about this study?

    Rochester: Clinical Trials Office 507-538-7623
                        
    Scottsdale: Clincal Trials Office 507-538-7623
                        

  10. Nonmyeloablative Conditioning With Pre- and Post-Transplant Rituximab Followed by Related or Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Patients With Advanced Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Multi-Center Trial

    Rochester, Minn. View Summary

    Nonmyeloablative Conditioning With Pre- and Post-Transplant Rituximab Followed by Related or Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Patients With Advanced Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Multi-Center Trial

    Location:

    Rochester, Minn.

    Trial status:

    Open for Enrollment

    Why is this study being done?

    PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. Determine whether nonmyeloablative conditioning and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) improves survival at 18 months for patients with fludarabine (fludarabine phosphate)-refractory, fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/rituximab (FCR)-failed, or del 17p CLL over that of historical controls (45% at 18 months) given CAMPATH-1H (alemtuzumab). SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. Estimate the overall response rate (complete remission [CR] + partial remission [PR]) by standard morphologic, flow cytometric, and molecular techniques. II. Assess the rate of relapse/progression. III. Define incidences of regimen-related toxicities (RRT) and infections within the first 100 days and the incidence of transplant-related mortality (TRM) within the first year. IV. Estimate incidences of grade II-III and III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and chronic GVHD. V. Determine whether the addition of rituximab to the nonmyeloablative conditioning and allogeneic HCT improves survival at 18 months over our historical data (57% at 18 months). VI. Determine the incidence of serious adverse events with the addition of rituximab in comparison to historical data of unrelated nonmyeloablative HCT. VII. Evaluate the pharmacokinetics of rituximab. VIII. Evaluate B-cell and T-cell immune reconstitution in comparison to historical data of unrelated nonmyeloablative HCT. IX. Describe donor and host polymorphisms of the FCgammaRIIIa receptor and cluster of differentiation (CD)32 and evaluate their impact on disease response and relapse. X. Investigate the mechanism of disease resistance in relapsed/nonresponding patients. XI. Isolate donor cytotoxic T lymphocytes specific for host minor histocompatibility antigens. OUTLINE: Patients receive a conditioning regimen comprising fludarabine phosphate intravenously (IV) on days -4 to -2 and rituximab IV on days -3, 10, 24, and 38. Patients undergo single fraction low-dose total-body irradiation (TBI) on day 0. After completion of TBI, patients undergo allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) on day 0. Patients then receive rituximab IV on days 10, 24, and 38. Patients receive an immunosuppressive regimen comprising cyclosporine orally (PO) twice daily (BID) on days -3 to 56 followed by a taper to day 180 (related recipients) or on days -3 to 100 followed by a taper to day 180 (unrelated recipients). Patients also receive mycophenolate mofetil PO BID on days 0-27 (related recipients) or three times daily (TID) on days 0-40 followed by a taper to day 96 (unrelated recipients). After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 6 months, 1 year, 18 months, 2 years, and then annually thereafter.

    NCT ID:

    NCT00104858

    Who can I contact for additional information about this study?

    Rochester: William J. Hogan 507-284-2511
                        


  1. Prev
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. Next